The final challenge is not about finding one magic climate solution. It is about combining actions that work at different levels, prioritising with evidence and communicating choices to people who can act. You will map solutions, compare impact and feasibility, examine the individual-versus-system debate, profile a real audience and build a climate strategy that […]
Scan to open this challenge on any device
Climate action is not one list of personal lifestyle tips. Solutions can change technology, infrastructure, markets, rules, finance, behaviour and culture.
The climate actions people hear about most are not always the actions with the biggest system impact.
The debate is often framed as either individuals must change or governments and companies must change. Real transitions usually involve interaction between both.
Choose one example — transport, food, home energy or consumption — and show how an individual choice is enabled or constrained by systems around it.
Research one policy or infrastructure change that altered individual behaviour at scale. Explain the mechanism linking system change and personal choices, and identify one limitation.
Facts matter, but people also respond to relevance, trust, identity, cost, convenience and who is delivering the message.
Your final challenge should show that you can connect science, activism, business, energy and justice rather than treating them as separate topics.
Set out three linked actions, responsible actors, evidence, progress measures and one justice consideration.
Pitch a focused strategy to a school leader, employer, council, funder or community board.
Create an audience-specific climate communication piece, then explain why you chose that message and format.
The aim is not to leave with one perfect answer. It is to be better able to judge evidence, trade-offs, strategy and fairness when climate decisions appear in real life.
Which challenge in the series most changed your thinking, and why?
What is one realistic climate decision you could now contribute to more confidently?
Which knowledge, technology or policy development would make you revisit your strategy in the future?
Your Step 5 output is the main evidence for this challenge. Keep the stated size or time limit so the focus stays on quality.
Choose Your Tools
Use the tools available to you. The quality of the thinking matters more than the software.
Use material from earlier challenges plus credible climate-solution sources. Distinguish estimated impact from popularity or visibility.
Use a simple audience profile: what they care about, what may block engagement and what evidence is likely to matter.
Use the format most likely to reach your chosen audience: short video, slides, one-page brief, social campaign concept or audio.
Your Step 5 output is the main evidence for this challenge. Keep the stated size or time limit so the focus stays on quality.
Choose Your Tools
Use the tools available to you. The quality of the thinking matters more than the software.
Use material from earlier challenges plus credible climate-solution sources. Distinguish estimated impact from popularity or visibility.
Use a simple audience profile: what they care about, what may block engagement and what evidence is likely to matter.
Use the format most likely to reach your chosen audience: short video, slides, one-page brief, social campaign concept or audio.
Choose Your Tools
Use the tools available to you. The quality of the thinking matters more than the software.
Use material from earlier challenges plus credible climate-solution sources. Distinguish estimated impact from popularity or visibility.
Use a simple audience profile: what they care about, what may block engagement and what evidence is likely to matter.
Use the format most likely to reach your chosen audience: short video, slides, one-page brief, social campaign concept or audio.