School in 2040: Research the Technologies That Could Change Learning

  AI tutors, virtual worlds, robotics, learning analytics and adaptive systems are often presented as the future of education. Some are already useful; others are still searching for convincing evidence or affordable implementation. You will build a technology radar that separates present reality, emerging possibility and speculation. By the end of this challenge you will: […]

Share this challenge
Assign in
Classroom
Microsoft
Teams

Scan to open this challenge on any device

Loading...

School in 2040: Research the Technologies That Could Change Learning

Your Mission
Build an evidence-based technology radar for the tools and models that could reshape learning by 2040.
You will classify maturity, match technology to learning problems, investigate evidence and identify the conditions required for adoption.
The Shape of This Challenge
Discover
✏️ ️ Notice & question
Explore
️ Investigate & test
Create
✏️ Make & communicate
Reflect
️ Think & apply

Discover

Start by separating what exists now from what is still mostly promise.
Step 1

Build a Technology Radar

✏️ Sort the horizon · 8–10 mins
We are learning to classify future-learning technologies by how mature they are today.

Not every exciting idea is equally close to widespread use.

Your Task
  1. Choose six technologies or learning models.
  2. Place each in Used now, Emerging/pilot or Mostly speculative.
  3. Mark the placement you are least certain about.
  4. Write what evidence would help you move it.
I can classify technologies by current maturity and identify uncertainty.
→ This gives you a shortlist worth researching properly.
ResearchCritical ThinkingDigital Literacy
Step 2

Match Technology to a Learning Problem

️ Problem-fit challenge · 8–10 mins
We are learning to evaluate technology by the problem it solves rather than by novelty.

A technology can be impressive and still be a poor answer to a classroom problem.

Your Task
  1. Choose four learning problems such as delayed feedback, inaccessible materials, limited expert access, practice at the right level or hard-to-visualise concepts.
  2. Match one technology/model to each.
  3. For each match, write one reason it may help and one reason it may fail.
  4. Choose the strongest match.
I can judge technology based on problem-solution fit.
→ This gives your research a clear purpose.
Problem SolvingCritical ThinkingCommunication

Explore

Research one technology properly and examine the conditions around implementation.
Step 3

Research the Evidence, Not the Demo

Choose your route · 12–18 mins
We are learning to evaluate evidence about one learning technology beyond promotional claims.

A polished demonstration shows what is possible, not necessarily what improves learning at scale.

Your Task
  1. Choose one technology/model.
  2. Complete one research route.
  3. Record one claimed benefit, one piece of evidence and one limitation.
  4. State whether the evidence is from a vendor, independent study, school pilot or another source.
⚡ Quick Track

Use one credible independent source plus one official/vendor source. Compare the claim with the evidence and identify one limitation.

Dig Deeper

Use at least two independent sources. Compare study/pilot context, learner group, outcome measured and what still remains uncertain.

I can evaluate evidence quality when judging a future-learning technology.
→ This becomes the core of your technology briefing.
ResearchCritical ThinkingInformation Evaluation
Step 4

What Would Have to Be True by 2040?

️ Conditions map · 10–12 mins
We are learning to identify the infrastructure, skills and safeguards required for a technology to scale.

Technology adoption depends on more than technical capability.

Your Task
  1. List five conditions needed for widespread use: cost, connectivity, teacher skill, evidence, privacy, accessibility, support, policy or another factor.
  2. Rate each condition ready, partly ready or major barrier.
  3. Choose the barrier most likely to matter.
  4. Write one development that could change your judgement.
I can identify non-technical conditions that shape whether innovation becomes normal practice.
→ This turns your final output from prediction into reasoned foresight.
Critical ThinkingProblem SolvingResearch

Create & Share

Create a technology radar that distinguishes evidence, uncertainty and hype.
Step 5

Create a Future Learning Technology Radar

✏️ Analyse · Create · 25–35 mins
We are learning to communicate which learning technologies deserve attention and why.

Your radar should distinguish what is ready now, what is emerging and what still needs major breakthroughs or evidence.

Your Task
  1. Include at least four technologies/models.
  2. Use one evidence-based example in detail.
  3. Show at least three adoption conditions.
  4. Include one technology you think is overhyped or underhyped and explain why.
  5. Choose one output below.
Learning Technology Radar
1 page · 4+ technologies + 120–160 words
⏱ 25–30 mins

Place technologies by maturity and annotate the strongest opportunity and barrier.

What Could Change Learning by 2040?
4 slides · maximum 30 words per slide
⏱ 30–35 mins

Compare technology, evidence, adoption conditions and your strongest forecast.

Future Learning Tech: Hype or Hope?
90 seconds final runtime
⏱ 30–35 mins

Evaluate one promising technology and explain what would need to happen before 2040.

I can create an evidence-based technology radar with maturity, value and adoption conditions.
→ This is your finished mission output.
ResearchCritical ThinkingCommunication
Step 6

Reflect, Apply, Look Forward

️ Think or discuss · 5–8 mins
We are learning to reflect on why technology forecasts need evidence and conditions.

The next challenge asks who benefits, who carries the risks and what fairness means in a technology-rich school.

Your Task
  1. Answer the prompts.
  2. Choose one technology whose value depends most on implementation rather than capability.
  3. Write one fairness risk to investigate next.
Reflect

Which technology moved most on your radar after research?

Apply

What current school technology could be used much better without waiting for new inventions?

Look Forward

What evidence would make you change your strongest 2040 prediction?

I can explain why future technology should be judged by evidence, context and adoption conditions.
→ You now have a technology evidence base ready for a fairness audit.
ReflectionResearchCritical Thinking
Dex
Dex AI Study Partner
* Click to generate
Hi! I'm Dex, your AI Study Partner. Ask me a question, attach a screenshot, test your skills with Quiz, or click Mastery for feedback!
Attachment Screenshot attached
🔒 Built with Google Gemini as a Study Partner trained strictly on this challenge content. No personal data is stored or shared.

TOOLKIT

Choose Your Tools

Use the tools available to you. Strong thinking, evidence and design choices matter more than a particular app.

Research

Use current credible sources for AI tutoring, immersive learning, robotics, accessibility, learning analytics or other technologies. Record publication dates.

Evaluate

Separate what exists now, what is being piloted and what remains speculative.

Create

Use a technology radar, briefing or short explainer.

Educator / Parent Notes

Age, Stage and Prior Learning: Designed for S1–S3. The challenge works best with a shortlist of credible current technologies/models rather than unrestricted futuristic searching.
Before You Start: Remind learners to record dates and distinguish vendor claims from independent evidence.
How to Open This: Ask: “How do we know when a technology demo has become a technology that genuinely improves learning?”
Scheduling: Steps 1–4 need 40–50 minutes. Step 5 needs 25–35 minutes.
If a Pupil Gets Stuck: Give learners four technology cards and two pre-selected sources for one technology.
For Fast Finishers: Ask learners to compare technologies using an evidence-confidence score or create a forecast with explicit assumptions.
Marking Guidance: Look for maturity classification, problem fit, source awareness, adoption conditions and appropriate uncertainty rather than confident prediction.

More like this

Multiple Sessions
60–90 minutes
60–90 minutes