Businesses can be major sources of emissions and powerful sources of innovation, investment and change. That makes corporate climate claims important — and worth checking carefully. You will trace where business emissions can occur, learn the warning signs of greenwashing, audit one real company claim and recommend what credible leadership would look like. By […]
Scan to open this challenge on any device
A business footprint is not limited to the lights in its office. Materials, suppliers, transport, product use and disposal can matter as much or more.
Words such as ‘green’, ‘eco’, ‘carbon neutral’ and ‘net zero’ can sound impressive while hiding important details.
Choose a company you know. Focus on one specific climate or sustainability claim rather than trying to judge the whole organisation.
Use the company’s own sustainability information plus one independent source. Check whether the claim includes a measurable target, timeframe and evidence of progress.
Use the company source plus at least two independent sources. Compare targets with absolute emissions, Scope 3 coverage and any third-party verification or criticism.
A useful audit does more than say a company is good or bad. It identifies the gap between the claim and what credible improvement would require.
Your final piece should separate claim, evidence, gap and recommendation. Avoid both corporate PR and blanket cynicism.
Use four sections: Claim, Evidence, Gap, Recommendation.
Present the claim, evidence, verdict and one priority action as if briefing senior leaders.
Explain whether the claim deserves trust, using evidence without oversimplifying the company.
The most useful position is rarely ‘believe every green claim’ or ‘all sustainability is fake’. Critical evaluation sits between those extremes.
Which piece of evidence most affected your verdict on the company claim?
How could this claim-checking method be used for products, investors, employers or public-sector procurement?
What evidence should companies be required to publish as climate disclosure becomes more important?
Your Step 5 output is the main evidence for this challenge. Keep the stated size or time limit so the focus stays on quality.
Choose Your Tools
Use the tools available to you. The quality of the thinking matters more than the software.
Use the company sustainability report or climate pages, then compare claims with independent evidence such as SBTi, CDP, regulators, credible journalism or sector data.
Use a document or spreadsheet to build a claim-versus-evidence table and record sources.
Use slides, a one-page briefing, infographic or short recorded analysis.
Your Step 5 output is the main evidence for this challenge. Keep the stated size or time limit so the focus stays on quality.
Choose Your Tools
Use the tools available to you. The quality of the thinking matters more than the software.
Use the company sustainability report or climate pages, then compare claims with independent evidence such as SBTi, CDP, regulators, credible journalism or sector data.
Use a document or spreadsheet to build a claim-versus-evidence table and record sources.
Use slides, a one-page briefing, infographic or short recorded analysis.
Choose Your Tools
Use the tools available to you. The quality of the thinking matters more than the software.
Use the company sustainability report or climate pages, then compare claims with independent evidence such as SBTi, CDP, regulators, credible journalism or sector data.
Use a document or spreadsheet to build a claim-versus-evidence table and record sources.
Use slides, a one-page briefing, infographic or short recorded analysis.