Power is not only about politicians, laws or who has the biggest job title. Money, information, expertise, ownership, reputation, relationships and public pressure can all shape what happens. In this challenge you will map one real decision and work out where influence actually sits — including the checks that stop power being unlimited.
Scan to open this challenge on any device
Return to your map. For three powerful actors, add one limit or counter-power: law, election, regulation, budget, public scrutiny, competition, courts, users leaving, staff refusing, evidence or another institution.
Choose one actor on your map and use an approved research tool to ask: “What formal powers does this UK or Scottish institution actually have, and what limits or accountability mechanisms apply? Give me an official source.” Open the original source and verify two details before adding them.
Use arrows to show different kinds of influence. Your short explanation should identify where formal authority sits and where informal influence matters.
Explain the decision, the main actors, the checks on power and your final judgement about whether power is concentrated or distributed.
Explain why ‘who is in charge?’ is often the wrong question. Use your mapped decision as the example.
Which type of power did you underestimate at the start — formal authority, money, information or relationships?
When you see a claim that one person or organisation ‘controls’ something, what question could you now ask?
Which future role interests you most: policymaker, journalist, lawyer, campaigner, regulator, researcher or business leader?
Workplaces, governments, platforms, schools, markets and communities all contain formal and informal power. Understanding who can decide, who can influence, who can challenge and who can implement helps learners move beyond conspiracy-style explanations and make better sense of institutions, organisations and change.
Workplaces, governments, platforms, schools, markets and communities all contain formal and informal power. Understanding who can decide, who can influence, who can challenge and who can implement helps learners move beyond conspiracy-style explanations and make better sense of institutions, organisations and change.